On the record · Research draft
Every placement.
Every source.
A public working ledger, latest research update 2026-09-15. Open any question to see parties grouped by answer, the source behind each proposed placement, and what remains unknown.
ABC Vancouver · 2/14 draft placements
Priorities include policing, encampment removal and a tax freeze. Its August proposal advocates stronger restrictions on public drug use and more involuntary care.
Affordable Housing · 0/14 draft placements
The linked campaign website could not be read in the September 15 recheck. Redmond’s 2022 voter-guide platform is historical and is not treated as a current party response.
Bright Future Vancouver · 2/14 draft placements
Proposes rental equity, fare-free transit and a targeted luxury-property levy. Its Foundations Fund would support public housing and infrastructure.
COPE · 4/14 draft placements
Council candidates emphasize affordability, co-op conversions and public services. The 2025 platform and withdrawn mayoral page remain online; they are not assumed current party answers.
Green Party of Vancouver · 4/14 draft placements
The current slate prioritizes affordability and climate action. Fry’s July overdose-prevention motion proposes operating standards, without specifying service expansion. Older priorities remain excluded from scoring.
Greens: Fry proposes overdose-prevention operating standards ↗
OneCity Vancouver · 5/14 draft placements
Its September transport plan proposes connected cycling routes and transit priority. An August campaign statement proposes a public housing builder; ownership details and council-slate confirmation remain research questions.
OneCity: You Belong in Vancouver ↗
TEAM for a Livable Vancouver · 5/14 draft placements
Its 2026 positions favour development fitting neighbourhood scale, co-ops, restored parking minimums, drug-use enforcement and voluntary and involuntary care.
TrueBlue Vancouver · 7/14 draft placements
The platform stresses cost control, policing, treatment and road capacity. Its site describes registration as incomplete; use the official City roster for candidate affiliations.
Vancouver Liberals · 2/14 draft placements
Proposes faster housing approvals, support for firefighters and continued school liaison officers. These do not establish a promise to increase the police budget.
Vote Vancouver · 5/14 draft placements
Proposes community ownership of public land, more co-ops, completing the Broadway bike lane and improving cycling connections.
Vote Vancouver: Housing & Belonging ↗
Your answers, beside the parties
How placements workHow much housing change?
Six-storey apartment buildings should be permitted on residential side streets throughout Vancouver.
Your answer: Not answered · Change answer
Strongly disagree
Disagree
TEAM for a Livable Vancouver Draft
Editorial estimate: Disagree (medium confidence)
TEAM proposes development within neighbourhood scale and context, with restored parking minimums. Hardwick favours construction within existing zoned capacity rather than further rezoning.
Neighbourhood-scale planning and reliance on existing zoned capacity suggest opposition to blanket six-storey permission. Source limits: This does not identify a citywide height permission. Existing zoning can already permit buildings larger than neighbouring structures. Candidate statement.
TEAM 2026 housing ↗
Colleen Hardwick Is Running for Mayor Again ↗
TrueBlue Vancouver Draft
Source mapping: Disagree
Policy 17 protects low-density areas and rejects blanket densification.
Directional opposition to citywide six-storey permission; height itself is unspecified. Printed p. 15.
Neither agree nor disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
Not established · 8 parties
Unknowns are outside the five answer choices. Open a party to see what was checked.
ABC Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
ABC campaign priorities ↗
ABC safety proposal ↗
ABC current priorities ↗
ABC earlier platform — not reaffirmed for 2026 ↗
Affordable Housing
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Affordable Housing Vancouver ↗
City 2022 voter guide: Eric Redmond ↗
Bright Future Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Bright Future Vancouver: Blueprint ↗
Bright Future: Pure Vancouver ↗
COPE
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
COPE council campaign ↗
COPE housing platform ↗
Stephanie Allen / COPE priorities ↗
COPE: platform meeting notice ↗
Green Party of Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Pete Fry campaign page ↗
Green priorities ↗
Greens: Fry proposes overdose-prevention operating standards ↗
Greens nominate 2026 council candidates ↗
OneCity Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
OneCity: Connect Vancouver ↗
OneCity: You Belong in Vancouver ↗
OneCity: public housing-builder proposal ↗
OneCity: Labour Day commitments ↗
Vancouver Liberals
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Vote Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Vote Vancouver: Housing & Belonging ↗
Vote Vancouver: Transportation Choice ↗
Vote Vancouver: Public Services ↗
Additional homes should be allowed on a residential lot even when this changes the surrounding neighbourhood’s building scale.
Your answer: Not answered · Change answer
Strongly disagree
Disagree
TEAM for a Livable Vancouver Draft
Source mapping: Disagree
Housing should fit neighbourhood scale.
A scale constraint on additional homes.
TrueBlue Vancouver Draft
Source mapping: Disagree
Policies 16–17 oppose broad density changes and protect low-density neighbourhoods.
Interpreted as opposing additions that override existing scale. Printed p. 15.
Neither agree nor disagree
Agree
COPE Draft
Editorial estimate: Agree (low confidence)
COPE proposes lifting the supportive-housing freeze and reviving the social housing initiative.
Restarting social housing permissions suggests accepting additional homes with some scale changes, especially for non-market housing. Generalising beyond that tenure is uncertain. Source limits: Allen/COPE joint campaign policy predating her withdrawal; seek Council-slate reaffirmation before scoring.
Green Party of Vancouver Draft
Editorial estimate: Agree (low confidence)
Fry welcomes a shift toward six-storey wood-frame housing.
Welcoming six-storey wood construction suggests accepting some change in scale to add homes. It does not establish permission everywhere. Source limits: A preferred construction form does not establish where it would be permitted. Candidate statement.
OneCity Vancouver Draft
Editorial estimate: Agree (medium confidence)
OneCity proposes permissive four- to six-storey housing with neighbourhood input and additional commercial space.
Four- to six-storey permissions imply some neighbourhood-scale change to add homes. Source limits: Azaroff letter predating withdrawal; geographic scope and role of resident consent remain ambiguous.
Strongly agree
Not established · 5 parties
Unknowns are outside the five answer choices. Open a party to see what was checked.
ABC Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
ABC campaign priorities ↗
ABC safety proposal ↗
ABC current priorities ↗
ABC earlier platform — not reaffirmed for 2026 ↗
Affordable Housing
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Affordable Housing Vancouver ↗
City 2022 voter guide: Eric Redmond ↗
Bright Future Vancouver
Not established
Pre-zones key areas for missing-middle and family homes.
Does not resolve the specific scale-change tradeoff.
Vancouver Liberals
Not established
Promises housing across Vancouver and faster approvals.
Does not settle neighbourhood building scale.
Vote Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Vote Vancouver: Housing & Belonging ↗
Vote Vancouver: Transportation Choice ↗
Vote Vancouver: Public Services ↗
Preserving the existing building scale should take priority over allowing additional homes in established neighbourhoods.
Your answer: Not answered · Change answer
Strongly disagree
Disagree
OneCity Vancouver Draft
Editorial estimate: Disagree (medium confidence)
OneCity proposes permissive four- to six-storey housing with neighbourhood input and additional commercial space.
Permitting additional apartment scale suggests not making existing scale the overriding priority. Consultation still matters in the proposal. Source limits: Azaroff letter predating withdrawal; geographic scope and role of resident consent remain ambiguous.
Neither agree nor disagree
Agree
TEAM for a Livable Vancouver Draft
Source mapping: Agree
Local built form constrains the proposed housing mix.
Supports retaining scale; affordability is also an objective.
TrueBlue Vancouver Draft
Source mapping: Agree
Policy 17 prioritizes protecting single-family and low-density areas.
Supports scale preservation over generalized additional density. Printed p. 15.
Strongly agree
Not established · 7 parties
Unknowns are outside the five answer choices. Open a party to see what was checked.
ABC Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
ABC campaign priorities ↗
ABC safety proposal ↗
ABC current priorities ↗
ABC earlier platform — not reaffirmed for 2026 ↗
Affordable Housing
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Affordable Housing Vancouver ↗
City 2022 voter guide: Eric Redmond ↗
Bright Future Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Bright Future Vancouver: Blueprint ↗
Bright Future: Pure Vancouver ↗
COPE
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
COPE council campaign ↗
COPE housing platform ↗
Stephanie Allen / COPE priorities ↗
COPE: platform meeting notice ↗
Green Party of Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Pete Fry campaign page ↗
Green priorities ↗
Greens: Fry proposes overdose-prevention operating standards ↗
Greens nominate 2026 council candidates ↗
Vancouver Liberals
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Vote Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Vote Vancouver: Housing & Belonging ↗
Vote Vancouver: Transportation Choice ↗
Vote Vancouver: Public Services ↗
Rezoning decisions should give the greatest weight to the views of residents already living nearby.
Your answer: Not answered · Change answer
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree nor disagree
Agree
TEAM for a Livable Vancouver Draft
Editorial estimate: Agree (low confidence)
Hardwick seeks community-led planning and would replace the official development plan. TEAM proposes development within neighbourhood scale and context, with restored parking minimums.
Community-led neighbourhood planning suggests greater influence for current local residents; greatest weight is an inference. Source limits: Local participation does not specify relative weight for existing and prospective residents. Candidate statement. This does not identify a citywide height permission.
Colleen Hardwick Is Running for Mayor Again ↗
TEAM 2026 housing ↗
TrueBlue Vancouver Draft
Source mapping: Agree
Policy 17 gives locals binding input on development.
Stronger than consultation: supports local decision-making priority. Printed p. 15.
Strongly agree
Not established · 8 parties
Unknowns are outside the five answer choices. Open a party to see what was checked.
ABC Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
ABC campaign priorities ↗
ABC safety proposal ↗
ABC current priorities ↗
ABC earlier platform — not reaffirmed for 2026 ↗
Affordable Housing
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Affordable Housing Vancouver ↗
City 2022 voter guide: Eric Redmond ↗
Bright Future Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Bright Future Vancouver: Blueprint ↗
Bright Future: Pure Vancouver ↗
COPE
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
COPE council campaign ↗
COPE housing platform ↗
Stephanie Allen / COPE priorities ↗
COPE: platform meeting notice ↗
Green Party of Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Pete Fry campaign page ↗
Green priorities ↗
Greens: Fry proposes overdose-prevention operating standards ↗
Greens nominate 2026 council candidates ↗
OneCity Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
OneCity: Connect Vancouver ↗
OneCity: You Belong in Vancouver ↗
OneCity: public housing-builder proposal ↗
OneCity: Labour Day commitments ↗
Vancouver Liberals
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Vote Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Vote Vancouver: Housing & Belonging ↗
Vote Vancouver: Transportation Choice ↗
Vote Vancouver: Public Services ↗
How housing gets delivered
The City should increase property taxes to finance more publicly owned housing.
Your answer: Not answered · Change answer
Strongly disagree
Disagree
ABC Vancouver Draft
Source mapping: Disagree
Promises a 2026–2027 property-tax freeze, with later increases tied to inflation.
Directional opposition to an extra property-tax increase for public housing during the freeze; not a claim of opposition to all public housing.
TrueBlue Vancouver Draft
Source mapping: Disagree
Seeks to restrain property-tax increases.
Opposes additional tax burden; housing-specific exceptions are unstated.
Neither agree nor disagree
Agree
Bright Future Vancouver Draft
Source mapping: Agree
A luxury-property levy would fund City-owned rentals among other uses.
A targeted levy, not an increase on every home; the plan seeks legal authority.
Strongly agree
Not established · 7 parties
Unknowns are outside the five answer choices. Open a party to see what was checked.
Affordable Housing
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Affordable Housing Vancouver ↗
City 2022 voter guide: Eric Redmond ↗
COPE
Not established
The platform-meeting agenda includes an affordable-housing definition.
An agenda does not supply the adopted tax or housing-ownership policy.
Green Party of Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Pete Fry campaign page ↗
Green priorities ↗
Greens: Fry proposes overdose-prevention operating standards ↗
Greens nominate 2026 council candidates ↗
OneCity Vancouver
Not established
The statement seeks senior-government investment for housing and infrastructure.
No commitment to raise property taxes for City-owned housing.
TEAM for a Livable Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
TEAM 2026 housing ↗
TEAM 2026 safety ↗
TEAM 2026 transportation ↗
TEAM: Respect for Neighbourhoods ↗
TEAM: Hastings-Sunrise traffic barriers ↗
Vancouver Liberals
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Vote Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Vote Vancouver: Housing & Belonging ↗
Vote Vancouver: Transportation Choice ↗
Vote Vancouver: Public Services ↗
The City should use its land, funding or planning powers to expand co-operative housing.
Your answer: Not answered · Change answer
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree nor disagree
Agree
Bright Future Vancouver Draft
Source mapping: Agree
Pro-family zoning includes co-ops.
Supports City action for co-ops; siting and funding remain qualified.
COPE Draft
Editorial estimate: Agree (medium confidence)
COPE proposes restoring the renters office and facilitating rental-to-co-op conversions. COPE describes Orr pursuing tenant purchases of rental buildings for co-op conversion.
The party-branded conversion proposal and Orr profile support expanding co-ops. The post-withdrawal slate has not reaffirmed the whole document. Source limits: Allen/COPE joint campaign policy predating her withdrawal; seek Council-slate reaffirmation before scoring. A campaign claim about a motion needs the original minutes; this is not proof of enactment.
TEAM for a Livable Vancouver Draft
Source mapping: Agree
Supports retaining, upgrading and building co-ops.
Explicit support for expanding co-operative homes.
Vote Vancouver Draft
Source mapping: Agree
Proposes more co-ops with community land trusts.
An explicit expansion commitment.
Strongly agree
Not established · 6 parties
Unknowns are outside the five answer choices. Open a party to see what was checked.
ABC Vancouver
Not established
An earlier platform promised to double co-operative housing.
First-term and end-of-2026 targets indicate earlier-election context; this review did not establish 2026 reaffirmation. Excluded from scoring.
Affordable Housing
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Affordable Housing Vancouver ↗
City 2022 voter guide: Eric Redmond ↗
Green Party of Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Pete Fry campaign page ↗
Green priorities ↗
Greens: Fry proposes overdose-prevention operating standards ↗
Greens nominate 2026 council candidates ↗
OneCity Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
OneCity: Connect Vancouver ↗
OneCity: You Belong in Vancouver ↗
OneCity: public housing-builder proposal ↗
OneCity: Labour Day commitments ↗
TrueBlue Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Vancouver Liberals
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
The City should focus its housing effort on enabling private construction rather than becoming a larger housing owner.
Your answer: Not answered · Change answer
Strongly disagree
Disagree
COPE Draft
Editorial estimate: Disagree (low confidence)
COPE proposes lifting the supportive-housing freeze and reviving the social housing initiative. Orr requests a workforce-housing study of municipal sites near hospitals and delivery partners including co-operatives.
Public and non-profit delivery proposals suggest opposing a predominantly private delivery emphasis. Larger City ownership itself is less explicit. Source limits: Allen/COPE joint campaign policy predating her withdrawal; seek Council-slate reaffirmation before scoring. Individual feasibility proposal; no construction outcome or party-wide position inferred.
The People's Audit ↗
Orr: Affordable Workforce Housing for Healthcare Workers ↗
OneCity Vancouver Draft
Editorial estimate: Disagree (medium confidence)
OneCity promotes a public builder with a target of 4,000 affordable homes.
The public builder suggests a larger public delivery role instead of a primarily private-construction emphasis. Ownership and funding details remain incomplete. Source limits: Pre-withdrawal announcement attributed to Azaroff and OneCity. Cost, tenure and continued commitment need confirmation.
Vote Vancouver Draft
Editorial estimate: Disagree (medium confidence)
Bligh proposes more co-op and community housing through community partners, retaining community ownership of public land. Bligh reserves City land for public, below-market housing while the housing gap persists.
Community partners and retained public land suggest opposition to prioritising private delivery over a public role. Source limits: The page attributes the commitments to Rebecca; do not silently assign a personal answer to every party candidate. Candidate statement with a stated housing-gap condition. Does not establish the legal ownership model or every future land transaction.
Vote Vancouver: Housing & Belonging ↗
Rebecca Bligh Wants Vancouver's Votes for Mayor ↗
Neither agree nor disagree
Agree
Vancouver Liberals Draft
Editorial estimate: Agree (low confidence)
Vancouver Liberals propose consolidating housing approvals and aligning the local building code with provincial rules. Allam proposes adopting the provincial building code and consolidating housing approvals.
The approvals and building-code emphasis suggests prioritising enabled construction over a larger City ownership role. It does not exclude public housing. Source limits: A permitting change does not establish support for neighbourhood scale changes. Regulatory simplification does not determine ownership or neighbourhood scale. Candidate statement.
Vancouver Liberals: Issues ↗
The Tyee interview with Kareem Allam ↗
Strongly agree
Not established · 6 parties
Unknowns are outside the five answer choices. Open a party to see what was checked.
ABC Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
ABC campaign priorities ↗
ABC safety proposal ↗
ABC current priorities ↗
ABC earlier platform — not reaffirmed for 2026 ↗
Affordable Housing
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Affordable Housing Vancouver ↗
City 2022 voter guide: Eric Redmond ↗
Bright Future Vancouver
Not established
The fund would support City-owned rentals alongside other housing and infrastructure.
Support for public housing does not settle its priority over enabling private construction.
Green Party of Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Pete Fry campaign page ↗
Green priorities ↗
Greens: Fry proposes overdose-prevention operating standards ↗
Greens nominate 2026 council candidates ↗
TEAM for a Livable Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
TEAM 2026 housing ↗
TEAM 2026 safety ↗
TEAM 2026 transportation ↗
TEAM: Respect for Neighbourhoods ↗
TEAM: Hastings-Sunrise traffic barriers ↗
TrueBlue Vancouver
Not established
Policies 8 and 14 support private construction and assistive housing.
No explicit ownership-versus-enabling priority. Printed pp. 11, 14.
Municipal land made available for housing should generally be sold to private builders rather than developed through public or non-profit partnerships.
Your answer: Not answered · Change answer
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Vote Vancouver Draft
Source mapping: Disagree
Retains land in community ownership.
Points against generally selling housing sites to private builders.
Neither agree nor disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
Not established · 9 parties
Unknowns are outside the five answer choices. Open a party to see what was checked.
ABC Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
ABC campaign priorities ↗
ABC safety proposal ↗
ABC current priorities ↗
ABC earlier platform — not reaffirmed for 2026 ↗
Affordable Housing
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Affordable Housing Vancouver ↗
City 2022 voter guide: Eric Redmond ↗
Bright Future Vancouver
Not established
The plan uses public land for housing and community facilities.
No general rule resolving sale versus public or non-profit partnerships is stated.
COPE
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
COPE council campaign ↗
COPE housing platform ↗
Stephanie Allen / COPE priorities ↗
COPE: platform meeting notice ↗
Green Party of Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Pete Fry campaign page ↗
Green priorities ↗
Greens: Fry proposes overdose-prevention operating standards ↗
Greens nominate 2026 council candidates ↗
OneCity Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
OneCity: Connect Vancouver ↗
OneCity: You Belong in Vancouver ↗
OneCity: public housing-builder proposal ↗
OneCity: Labour Day commitments ↗
TEAM for a Livable Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
TEAM 2026 housing ↗
TEAM 2026 safety ↗
TEAM 2026 transportation ↗
TEAM: Respect for Neighbourhoods ↗
TEAM: Hastings-Sunrise traffic barriers ↗
TrueBlue Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Vancouver Liberals
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Streets and getting around
The City should build more protected bike lanes to connect its cycling network.
Your answer: Not answered · Change answer
Strongly disagree
Disagree
TrueBlue Vancouver Draft
Editorial estimate: Disagree (low confidence)
TrueBlue proposes protecting road capacity and parking and auditing underused bike lanes.
Protecting road capacity and auditing bike lanes suggest a more restrictive stance toward expansion. An audit alone is not a ban on new routes. Source limits: An audit does not by itself establish opposition to every new protected route.
Neither agree nor disagree
Agree
Green Party of Vancouver Draft
Editorial estimate: Agree (low confidence)
Fry supports active transportation and transit investment.
Active-transport investment suggests support for additional protected connections; a route-specific pledge is absent. Source limits: Does not specify protected cycling infrastructure or allocation of street space. Candidate statement.
OneCity Vancouver Draft
Source mapping: Agree
Promises a connected all-ages cycling network.
Clear support for expanding safe cycling routes.
Vote Vancouver Draft
Source mapping: Agree
Completes Broadway’s bike lane and improves its connections.
Explicit expansion, though geographically specific.
Strongly agree
Not established · 6 parties
Unknowns are outside the five answer choices. Open a party to see what was checked.
ABC Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
ABC campaign priorities ↗
ABC safety proposal ↗
ABC current priorities ↗
ABC earlier platform — not reaffirmed for 2026 ↗
Affordable Housing
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Affordable Housing Vancouver ↗
City 2022 voter guide: Eric Redmond ↗
Bright Future Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Bright Future Vancouver: Blueprint ↗
Bright Future: Pure Vancouver ↗
COPE
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
COPE council campaign ↗
COPE housing platform ↗
Stephanie Allen / COPE priorities ↗
COPE: platform meeting notice ↗
TEAM for a Livable Vancouver
Not established
Supports improvements for all transportation modes.
Does not specify additional protected lanes.
Vancouver Liberals
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Maintaining vehicle capacity on busy streets should take priority over adding bus or bike lanes.
Your answer: Not answered · Change answer
Strongly disagree
Disagree
OneCity Vancouver Draft
Editorial estimate: Disagree (medium confidence)
OneCity proposes a connected walking and cycling network, prioritising neighbourhoods with poorer access. OneCity proposes transit-priority streets with TransLink and exploring public ownership of Mobi.
Transit-priority streets and a connected active network suggest giving bus and bike movement priority in some constrained corridors. The universal trade-off is inferred. Source limits: No priced route list or explicit parking-removal commitment established. Exploration is not an acquisition or funding agreement.
Vote Vancouver Draft
Editorial estimate: Disagree (low confidence)
Bligh promises to complete the Broadway bike lane and improve connecting routes.
Completing Broadway cycling connections suggests reallocating street space when needed. The general vehicle-capacity trade-off is inferred. Source limits: The page does not specify which parking spaces would be removed.
Neither agree nor disagree
Agree
TrueBlue Vancouver Draft
Source mapping: Agree
Protects vehicle capacity and parking in bike-lane decisions.
Road capacity receives priority; transit support remains conditional.
Strongly agree
Not established · 7 parties
Unknowns are outside the five answer choices. Open a party to see what was checked.
ABC Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
ABC campaign priorities ↗
ABC safety proposal ↗
ABC current priorities ↗
ABC earlier platform — not reaffirmed for 2026 ↗
Affordable Housing
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Affordable Housing Vancouver ↗
City 2022 voter guide: Eric Redmond ↗
Bright Future Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Bright Future Vancouver: Blueprint ↗
Bright Future: Pure Vancouver ↗
COPE
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
COPE council campaign ↗
COPE housing platform ↗
Stephanie Allen / COPE priorities ↗
COPE: platform meeting notice ↗
Green Party of Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Pete Fry campaign page ↗
Green priorities ↗
Greens: Fry proposes overdose-prevention operating standards ↗
Greens nominate 2026 council candidates ↗
TEAM for a Livable Vancouver
Not established
TEAM supports removing most barriers in a specified Hastings-Sunrise area.
The release rejects a blanket citywide position; it does not answer a general bus/bike-lane capacity tradeoff.
Vancouver Liberals
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Policing and public safety
The City should increase police funding faster than inflation.
Your answer: Not answered · Change answer
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree nor disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
Not established · 10 parties
Unknowns are outside the five answer choices. Open a party to see what was checked.
ABC Vancouver
Not established
Highlights police investment.
Past investment does not specify a future increase above inflation.
Affordable Housing
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Affordable Housing Vancouver ↗
City 2022 voter guide: Eric Redmond ↗
Bright Future Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Bright Future Vancouver: Blueprint ↗
Bright Future: Pure Vancouver ↗
COPE
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
COPE council campaign ↗
COPE housing platform ↗
Stephanie Allen / COPE priorities ↗
COPE: platform meeting notice ↗
Green Party of Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Pete Fry campaign page ↗
Green priorities ↗
Greens: Fry proposes overdose-prevention operating standards ↗
Greens nominate 2026 council candidates ↗
OneCity Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
OneCity: Connect Vancouver ↗
OneCity: You Belong in Vancouver ↗
OneCity: public housing-builder proposal ↗
OneCity: Labour Day commitments ↗
TEAM for a Livable Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
TEAM 2026 housing ↗
TEAM 2026 safety ↗
TEAM 2026 transportation ↗
TEAM: Respect for Neighbourhoods ↗
TEAM: Hastings-Sunrise traffic barriers ↗
TrueBlue Vancouver
Not established
Policy 31 promises continued strong police funding.
No above-inflation growth pledge. Printed p. 26.
Vancouver Liberals
Not established
Supports school liaison officers and affordable event policing.
Neither specifies a budget increase above inflation.
Vote Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Vote Vancouver: Housing & Belonging ↗
Vote Vancouver: Transportation Choice ↗
Vote Vancouver: Public Services ↗
Mental-health and addiction crises should generally be answered by health workers rather than police.
Your answer: Not answered · Change answer
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree nor disagree
Agree
Green Party of Vancouver Draft
Editorial estimate: Agree (medium confidence)
Fry supports peer-led crisis teams and a 911-dispatched alternative with police backup.
Peer-led crisis teams with police backup suggest a health-led default. The general dispatch rule is inferred. Source limits: Supports an alternative model without specifying that health workers generally replace police for both crisis types. Candidate statement; no automatic party attribution.
Strongly agree
Not established · 9 parties
Unknowns are outside the five answer choices. Open a party to see what was checked.
ABC Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
ABC campaign priorities ↗
ABC safety proposal ↗
ABC current priorities ↗
ABC earlier platform — not reaffirmed for 2026 ↗
Affordable Housing
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Affordable Housing Vancouver ↗
City 2022 voter guide: Eric Redmond ↗
Bright Future Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Bright Future Vancouver: Blueprint ↗
Bright Future: Pure Vancouver ↗
COPE
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
COPE council campaign ↗
COPE housing platform ↗
Stephanie Allen / COPE priorities ↗
COPE: platform meeting notice ↗
OneCity Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
OneCity: Connect Vancouver ↗
OneCity: You Belong in Vancouver ↗
OneCity: public housing-builder proposal ↗
OneCity: Labour Day commitments ↗
TEAM for a Livable Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
TEAM 2026 housing ↗
TEAM 2026 safety ↗
TEAM 2026 transportation ↗
TEAM: Respect for Neighbourhoods ↗
TEAM: Hastings-Sunrise traffic barriers ↗
TrueBlue Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Vancouver Liberals
Not established
The platform promises resources for firefighters responding to crises.
It does not specify health workers rather than police as the general first response.
Vote Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Vote Vancouver: Housing & Belonging ↗
Vote Vancouver: Transportation Choice ↗
Vote Vancouver: Public Services ↗
Drugs, treatment and health
The City should strengthen its laws to prohibit open-air use of hard drugs in public spaces.
Your answer: Not answered · Change answer
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree nor disagree
Agree
ABC Vancouver Draft
Source mapping: Agree
Sim advocates a Yes vote on stronger public-drug-use restrictions.
Direct support for the proposed policy direction.
Strongly agree
Not established · 9 parties
Unknowns are outside the five answer choices. Open a party to see what was checked.
Affordable Housing
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Affordable Housing Vancouver ↗
City 2022 voter guide: Eric Redmond ↗
Bright Future Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Bright Future Vancouver: Blueprint ↗
Bright Future: Pure Vancouver ↗
COPE
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
COPE council campaign ↗
COPE housing platform ↗
Stephanie Allen / COPE priorities ↗
COPE: platform meeting notice ↗
Green Party of Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Pete Fry campaign page ↗
Green priorities ↗
Greens: Fry proposes overdose-prevention operating standards ↗
Greens nominate 2026 council candidates ↗
OneCity Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
OneCity: Connect Vancouver ↗
OneCity: You Belong in Vancouver ↗
OneCity: public housing-builder proposal ↗
OneCity: Labour Day commitments ↗
TEAM for a Livable Vancouver
Not established
Supports enforcing laws against public drug use.
Enforcing existing laws does not establish support for stronger new laws.
TrueBlue Vancouver
Not established
Policy 28 favours enforcement against dealers.
Does not specify stronger public-use laws. Printed p. 24.
Vancouver Liberals
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Vote Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Vote Vancouver: Housing & Belonging ↗
Vote Vancouver: Transportation Choice ↗
Vote Vancouver: Public Services ↗
The City should expand overdose prevention and supervised consumption services.
Your answer: Not answered · Change answer
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree nor disagree
Agree
COPE Draft
Editorial estimate: Agree (low confidence)
Orr criticises the attempt to block an overdose prevention site.
Orr opposing a blocked site suggests support for additional service access. This is an individual position used as a cautious party proxy. Source limits: Individual statement. Check official minutes before attributing a recorded vote.
Green Party of Vancouver Draft
Editorial estimate: Agree (low confidence)
Fry requests operating and licensing standards for harm reduction facilities while maintaining service access.
Maintaining access and supporting regulated facilities suggests willingness to accommodate services where needed. Expansion is inferred, not promised. Source limits: Submitted report-back request, not an enacted policy or expansion target.
Fry: Policy Framework for Overdose Prevention and Harm Reduction Facilities ↗
Vancouver Liberals Draft
Editorial estimate: Agree (low confidence)
Allam would reverse the supportive-housing ban and rejects banning overdose-prevention sites.
Rejecting a ban on sites suggests permitting additional service access. Use of the mayoral position as a party proxy and expansion are both inferred. Source limits: Candidate statement. Maintaining access is distinct from promising additional services.
Strongly agree
Not established · 7 parties
Unknowns are outside the five answer choices. Open a party to see what was checked.
ABC Vancouver
Not established
Opposes the proposed 900 Helmcken consumption site.
Opposing one location does not establish opposition to all expansion.
Affordable Housing
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Affordable Housing Vancouver ↗
City 2022 voter guide: Eric Redmond ↗
Bright Future Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Bright Future Vancouver: Blueprint ↗
Bright Future: Pure Vancouver ↗
OneCity Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
OneCity: Connect Vancouver ↗
OneCity: You Belong in Vancouver ↗
OneCity: public housing-builder proposal ↗
OneCity: Labour Day commitments ↗
TEAM for a Livable Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
TEAM 2026 housing ↗
TEAM 2026 safety ↗
TEAM 2026 transportation ↗
TEAM: Respect for Neighbourhoods ↗
TEAM: Hastings-Sunrise traffic barriers ↗
TrueBlue Vancouver
Not established
Policy 28 favours prevention and treatment.
No explicit supervised-service expansion position. Printed p. 24.
Vote Vancouver
Not established
No current, sufficiently specific answer established in the sources listed for this party. This is a research gap, not neutrality or refusal to answer.
Vote Vancouver: Housing & Belonging ↗
Vote Vancouver: Transportation Choice ↗
Vote Vancouver: Public Services ↗